Need a court document? Have an advocate prepare it.
Tell us about your dispute and the court involved. Request a document drafted for your facts, with your evidence and the relief you need.
An advocate confirms availability, scope and fees before accepting your matter.Full text of the document
Educational sample. Replace bracketed fields using your evidence.
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MOMBASA
CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO [reference]
[RESIDENT PETITIONERS] v [COUNTY RESPONDENTS]
EVIDENCE OR COMPUTATION SCHEDULE
1. This schedule groups the evidence by alleged institutional omission: committee establishment, public planning framework, stakeholder information and individual development decisions. Each entry identifies its author, date, custodian, relevance, authenticating witness and actual bundle page.
2. For committee establishment include official appointment notices, committee membership and operational information, enquiries and responses. Mark unknown or disputed dates expressly. A historic judicial finding does not prove that a committee remains absent at the date of a later application.
3. For public participation include invitations, attendance, accessible materials, submissions received and the response to those submissions. The strategic urban plan, legislation and administrative approvals are separate documents. Do not label a policy automatically as enacted county legislation.
4. For individual project impacts identify the permit, affected site and alleged requirement, with the relevant expert explanation of photographs, maps and infrastructure evidence. General photographs without a demonstrated connection to a particular constitutional harm are marked insufficient.
5. The source orders used 180, 90 and 45 days from delivery for different obligations. Enter the certified delivery date, each operative requirement, actual subsequent records and any variation. This evidential schedule is not a contempt application or proof that a historical deadline remains enforceable unchanged.
DATED at [place] on [date]. Signed [party or advocate]. DRAWN AND FILED BY [name and address for service]. TO BE SERVED UPON [each affected person and address].
Need a court document? Have an advocate prepare it.
Tell us about your dispute and the court involved. Request a document drafted for your facts, with your evidence and the relief you need.
An advocate confirms availability, scope and fees before accepting your matter.Educational reconstruction from a reported decision. Newly drafted sample, not an original filing or a matter handled by our team. Identifying details are replaced with bracketed fields. Verify the facts, law, jurisdiction and court directions before use.
Use and evidence notes
This is an evidential or accounting aid, not an originating process or independent proof. Give dates, authors or custodians, admissibility status, actual document pages and transparent calculations. Label missing and disputed items. Obtain the applicable leave or directions for supplementary evidence, serve it and prevent duplicate credits or recovery.
Supporting material: [date]; [author or custodian]; [description]; [bundle page]; [authenticating witness]; [admission or permission]. Attach genuine records only. This public specimen contains no exhibits, signatures, personal identifiers or sworn declaration.
Source facts and limits of the decision
Fifteen residents challenged county development regulation, high-rise impacts and the absence of the statutory planning liaison committee. Photographs and a map did not sufficiently prove the particular approval, privacy, water, sewer and road violations alleged.
The petition partly succeeded. The Court ordered a development framework within 180 days, a liaison committee within 90 days and public sensitisation on the 2015–2035 strategic urban plan within 45 days. The construction authority was struck out as improperly joined and each party bore its costs.
The Court relied on Articles 10, 42, 47, 48, 50, 69 and 70. The judgment cites PLUPA sections 72–73, but the Act places county committee establishment, composition and functions in sections 76–78; that source numbering is not copied into the specimens. Individual development-approval challenges require the appropriate statutory remedy and precise evidence. The decision does not cancel all permits or establish present non-compliance with its historical deadlines.
Read the original reported decision: [2025] KEELC 824 (KLR) — 21 February 2025
The original decision may identify participants. The specimen replaces their identifying details. The reproduced primary judicial text, Mombasa court heading, reasons and operative orders were checked. Source contradictions and unsuccessful positions are identified. These are newly drafted educational specimens, not original pleadings or matters handled by our team. No genuine exhibits, signatures, subsequent-order assurance or licensed-advocate review is claimed. Check the authentic file, current law and directions before use.
Related law and procedural rules
Constitution of Kenya · Physical and Land Use Planning Act · Evidence Act
Constitutional petition Practice and Procedure Rules 2013 — check current amendments
Need a court document? Have an advocate prepare it.
Tell us about your dispute and the court involved. Request a document drafted for your facts, with your evidence and the relief you need.
An advocate confirms availability, scope and fees before accepting your matter.